When a system needs to know the position or movement of a motor, simply detecting rotation is often not enough. Industrial machines, robotics, CNC systems, and automation equipment require accurate position feedback to control speed, direction, and movement.

Two common solutions are incremental encoders and absolute encoders. Although both measure rotation, they provide information in very different ways.

Choosing between them depends on whether the system only needs relative movement information or requires the exact position immediately after startup.

image.png

How Incremental Encoders Work

An incremental encoder generates pulses as the shaft rotates. The controller counts these pulses to determine movement distance and uses the phase difference between two channels (A and B) to determine rotation direction.

The main advantage is simplicity and cost. Because the output only represents changes in position, incremental encoders are widely used in motor speed control, conveyor systems, and motion applications where the reference position can be established during startup.

However, if power is removed, the controller loses the stored position unless the system performs a homing procedure.

How Absolute Encoders Work

An absolute encoder provides a unique digital value for each shaft position. Even after power loss, the system can immediately know the current position without needing to move back to a reference point.

This makes absolute encoders valuable in applications where position accuracy and startup reliability are critical, such as robotic arms, servo systems, and precision machinery.

The trade-off is increased cost and more complex communication requirements.

image.png

Quick Comparison

Feature Incremental Encoder Absolute Encoder
Output Pulse Signal Position Code
Startup Position Requires Reference Available Immediately
Cost Lower Higher
Complexity Simple More Advanced
Common Use Speed & Motion Control Precision Positioning

Recommended Devices

Device Type Typical Application
Omron E6B2-CWZ6C Incremental Encoder Motor speed and position
Autonics E40S Series Incremental Encoder Industrial automation
AS5048A Absolute Magnetic Encoder Precision rotary position
AMS AS5600 Absolute Magnetic Encoder Embedded position sensing

Engineering Tip

If your system can safely perform home after startup, an incremental encoder is often the more economical choice. If losing position after power failure is unacceptable, an absolute encoder is usually worth the additional cost.

Incremental and absolute encoders are not competitors; they solve different engineering problems. Incremental encoders provide a simple and cost-effective way to measure movement, while absolute encoders provide immediate position awareness and higher reliability. Selecting the correct type depends on the application's accuracy requirements, startup behavior, and system complexity.

#SensorsAndActuators# #Encoder# #MotionControl# #Automation# #EmbeddedSystems# #Electronics#

#SensorsAndActuators#
#Encoder#
#MotionControl#
#Automation#
#EmbeddedSystems#
#Electronics#
Sensors & Actuators

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!